Development of a Methodology to Model an Average Neck Shape from 3D Optical Scanning
Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, ISSN: 2195-4364, Page: 57-64
2024
- 86Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures86
- Readers86
- 86
Conference Paper Description
Nowadays the interest for improving methodologies to design customized external devices for the neck has considerably grown, considered that neck pathologies are widespread among the population. Their design for additive manufacturing starts by acquiring the body’s part and, in order to achieve a satisfactory end result, the support of accurate reconstructed models from fast scans is relevant. At this aim, the availability of an average or statistical model could be potentially useful for reducing acquisition time and for upgrading low-resolution scans. This paper focuses on the application of a methodology for the creation of an average model of human neck. The method required the use of a set of scans, acquired by means of a structured light scanner, from which an accurate reconstruction of the neck surface was obtained. A number of healthy subjects of both genders was considered and the digital neck surfaces were used for creating an average digital model for males and for females. The methodology developed was based on mesh morphing and was applied to the sample considered with satisfactory results. The procedure is also suitable for the development of statistical models of the neck, that will cover future research.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85193575931&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58094-9_7; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-58094-9_7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58094-9_7; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-58094-9_7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know