Use of Linguistic Variables in Control Charts: A Comparative Literature Analysis
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, ISSN: 2367-3389, Vol: 1089 LNNS, Page: 269-276
2024
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Conference Paper Description
Process monitoring, diagnosis, and supervision are critical components of quality management. For this aim, control charts (CCs) are one of the important tools for statistical process control (SPC). However, given the uncertainties in real-world problems, classical logic is often ineffective due to the assumptions it considers while modelling these uncertainties. On the other hand, if qualityrelated characteristics are determined by linguistic expressions, classical CCs are insufficient to explain quality characteristics, and correctly evaluate the process. As a solution to this problem, decision analyses of CCs developed with linguistic variables under uncertainty are usually performed by using the fuzzy set theory. For this reason, a literature review has been conducted for the purpose of this study. As a result, the aim is to establish a foundation and provide direction for future studies, which consist uncertainty in quality assessment processes, by using linguistic variables to more effectively model the problem.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85207023784&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67195-1_32; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-67195-1_32; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67195-1_32; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-67195-1_32
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know