Monitoring attention with embedded frequency markers for simulation environments
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 9743, Page: 394-403
2016
- 1Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Monitoring both overt and covert attention shifts is critical for the accurate real-time assessment of user state in training or simulation environments. Current attention-monitoring methods predominantly include eye-tracking, but eye-tracking alone is blind to covert shifts in visual attention such as internal distraction and mind-wandering. Steady state visual evoked potentials (ssVEPs) are neural signals that are sensitive to covert attention shifts and offer a means to measure endogenous engagement. Laboratories use ssVEPS to study the dynamics of attentional systems, but the frequencies most often used are causes eyestrain and are highly distracting making them impractical for applied use within simulation or training environments. To overcome this limitation, we examine whether frequencies above the perceptual threshold are similarly sensitive to covert attention shifts. Our qualified results indicate supraperceptual threshold ssVEPs are sensitive to such shifts and should be considered for real-time use.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84978901306&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39955-3_37; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-39955-3_37; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-39955-3_37; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39955-3_37; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-39955-3_37
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know