Indoor localization of JADE agents without a dedicated infrastructure
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 10413 LNAI, Page: 256-271
2017
- 9Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
This paper describes and compares two of the algorithms for indoor localization that are implemented in the localization add-on module for JADE. Described algorithms perform localization of agents running on smart devices in known indoor environments using only received WiFi signals from access points. First, distance estimates from access points are computed using received signal strength in routinary network discovery. Then, computed distance estimates are used to generate estimates of the position of the smart device that hosts the agent using one of described algorithms. The first algorithm, known as two-stage maximum-likelihood algorithm, is a well-known technique and it is considered a point of reference to evaluate the performance of other algorithms. The second algorithm, which has been recently introduced to overcome numerical-instability problems of classic geometric algorithms, works by turning localization into an optimization problem which is effectively solved using particle swarm optimization. In order to show the applicability of the proposed algorithms, the last part of the paper shows experimental results obtained in an illustrative indoor scenario, which is representative of envisioned applications.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85028455810&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64798-2_16; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-64798-2_16; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-64798-2_16; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64798-2_16; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-64798-2_16
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know