Categorizing 4.0 Technologies within the Context of Education 4.0
Lecture Notes in Educational Technology, ISSN: 2196-4971, Vol: Part F3283, Page: 369-379
2024
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Book Chapter Description
Today, the implementation of current and emerging technologies (also known as 4.0 Technologies) to carry out core processes in education has taken high relevance. We find a lack of references on how designers and educators can easily recognize, describe, and apply these technologies. In this work, we propose a categorization of 4.0 Technologies that can help designers and educators better understand how 4.0 Technologies can be integrated into the design of educational systems within the context of Education 4.0. Therefore, five generic categories were identified: (i) Connectivity, (ii) Digitalization, (iii) Datafication, (iv) Smartification, and (v) Virtualization, which are also divided into partial and specific technologies. To illustrate the proposed categorization, we present a case study involving a hologram teacher and a decision-making center.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85201976559&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1814-6_36; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-97-1814-6_36; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1814-6_36; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-97-1814-6_36
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know