Conformal a-anomaly of some non-unitary 6d superconformal theories
Journal of High Energy Physics, ISSN: 1029-8479, Vol: 2015, Issue: 9
2015
- 34Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We compute the conformal anomaly a-coefficient for some non-unitary (higher derivative or non-gauge-invariant) 6d conformal fields and their supermultiplets. We use the method based on a connection between 6d determinants on S and 7d determinants on AdS. We find, in particular, that (1,0) supermultiplet containing 4-derivative gauge-invariant conformal vector has precisely the value of a-anomaly as attributed in arXiv:1506.03807 (on the basis of R-symmetry and gravitational ’t Hooft anomaly matching) to the standard (1,0) vector multiplet. We also show that higher derivative (2,0) 6d conformal supergravity coupled to exactly 26 (2,0) tensor multiplets has vanishing a-anomaly (and also vanishing Casimir energy on 5-sphere). This is the 6d counterpart of the known fact of cancellation of the conformal anomaly in the 4d system of N=4 conformal supergravity coupled to 4 vector N=4 multiplets. In the case when 5 of tensor multiplets are chosen to be ghost-like and the conformal symmetry is spontaneously broken by a quadratic scalar constraint the resulting IR theory may be identified with (2,0) Poincaré supergravity coupled to 21 = 26 − 5 tensor multiplets. The latter theory is known to be special — it is gravitational anomaly free and results upon compactification of 10d type IIB supergravity on K3.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84941337419&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/jhep09(2015)017; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/JHEP09(2015)017; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/JHEP09(2015)017; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/JHEP09(2015)017.pdf; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/jhep09%282015%29017; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/jhep09%282015%29017; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP09(2015)017
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know