Pollen embryogenesis: Atavism or totipotency?
Protoplasma, ISSN: 0033-183X, Vol: 202, Issue: 3-4, Page: 115-121
1998
- 11Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The origins of pollen embryogenesis are still in doubt. Totipotency of plant cells has traditionally been put forward as an explanation for this phenomenon but we have found this interpretation to involve some shortcomings. The pollen grain is a highly differentiated structure which should have a very reduced capability of regenerating a whole plant, whereas in some species the induction of androgenesis appears to occur with greater facility than somatic embryogenesis. Furthermore, some microspores seem to have a tendency to morphogenesis and organogenesis; spontaneous androgenesis occurs naturally in various species and many examples also occur of pollen dimorphism. Totipotency would seem to be insufficient to explain androgenesis and we propose that its origin might be found in the phenomenon of atavism. According to studies published on ancestral precursors of pollen, these structures appear to have had high proliferation capacity. The ability to form a multicellular structure from a single haploid cell is shared by the meiocytes of ancestral algae, of the first land plants, and of present-day ferns, which are evolutionarily related to pollen. Atavism is only expressed under certain circumstances, as indeed is androgenesis, normally as a consequence of an environmental stress. Our conclusion is that there is evidence enough to suggest that androgenesis may well be the expression of archaic genes of meiocytes with morphogenic capacity which were naturally expressed in the ancestors of flowering plants.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0031810256&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01282539; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF01282539; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/BF01282539; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01282539; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01282539; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/BF01282539
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know