EANM procedural guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT and SPECT/CT: 2015 revision
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, ISSN: 1619-7089, Vol: 42, Issue: 12, Page: 1929-1940
2015
- 269Citations
- 333Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations269
- Citation Indexes269
- 269
- CrossRef245
- Captures333
- Readers333
- 284
- 49
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Evaluation of a Strategy Guided by Imaging Versus Systematic Coronary Angioplasty in Elderly Patients With Ischemia; EVAOLD
STUDY INFORMATION OFFICIAL TITLE: Evaluation of a Strategy Guided by Imaging Versus Systematic Coronary Angioplasty in Elderly Patients With Ischemia: a Multicentric Randomized Non Inferiority
Article Description
Since the publication of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) procedural guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in 2005, many small and some larger steps of progress have been made, improving MPI procedures. In this paper, the major changes from the updated 2015 procedural guidelines are highlighted, focusing on the important changes related to new instrumentation with improved image information and the possibility to reduce radiation exposure, which is further discussed in relation to the recent developments of new International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) models. Introduction of the selective coronary vasodilator regadenoson and the use of coronary CT-contrast agents for hybrid imaging with SPECT/CT angiography are other important areas for nuclear cardiology that were not included in the previous guidelines. A large number of minor changes have been described in more detail in the fully revised version available at the EANM home page: http://eanm.org/publications/guidelines/2015_07_EANM_FINAL_myocardial_perfusion_guideline.pdf.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84942989815&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3139-x; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26290421; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00259-015-3139-x; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3139-x; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00259-015-3139-x; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs00259-015-3139-x.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00259-015-3139-x
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know