Inflow forecasting using regularized extreme learning machine: Haditha reservoir chosen as case study
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, ISSN: 1436-3259, Vol: 36, Issue: 12, Page: 4201-4221
2022
- 19Citations
- 18Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
For effective water resource management, water budgeting, and optimal release discharge from a reservoir, the accurate prediction of daily inflow is critical. An attempt has been made using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to enhance water management efficiency in the Haditha-dam reservoir. This case study occasionally suffers from severe drought events and thus causes significant water shortages as well as stopping hydroelectric power stations for several months. Four different approaches were employed for inflow forecasting, namely multiple linear regression (MLR), random forest (RF), extreme learning machine (ELM), and regularized extreme learning machine (RELM). Autocorrelation function (ACF) and partial autocorrelation function (PACF) were used to select the best-lagged variables. The obtained results revealed the superiority of the RELM model compared to other forecast models. The proposed model (RELM) yielded higher prediction accuracy, and its prediction records were similar to the actual values. Moreover, the adopted model achieved a higher correlation of coefficient value (R = 0.955). The regularization approach effectively enhanced the prediction capacity and the generalization ability of the proposed model. On the other hand, the RF model's performance capacity was poor compared to other comparable models due to the overfitting issue. Moreover, the results showed that the PACF (partial autocorrelation function) gave more accurate and realistic predictors than ACF (autocorrelation function) because of its ability to cope with a sudden temporal variation of inflow time series. Overall, the RELM approach provided higher adequacy and tighter confidence in forecasting daily inflow even in noisy data and severe climatic conditions.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know