Characteristics and outcomes of advanced cancer patients who miss outpatient supportive care consult appointments
Supportive Care in Cancer, ISSN: 1433-7339, Vol: 22, Issue: 10, Page: 2869-2874
2014
- 19Citations
- 45Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations19
- Citation Indexes19
- 19
- CrossRef11
- Captures45
- Readers45
- 45
Article Description
Background: Missed appointments (MA) are frequent, but there are no studies on the effects of the first MA at supportive care outpatient clinics on clinical outcomes. Methods: We determined the frequency of MA among all patients referred to our clinic from January–December 2011 and recorded the clinical and demographic data and outcomes of 218 MA patients and 217 consecutive patients who kept their first appointments (KA). Results: Of 1,352 advanced-cancer patients referred to our clinic, 218 (16 %) had an MA. The MA patients’ median age was 57 years (interquartile range, 49–67). The mean time between referral and appointment was 7.4 days (range, 0–71) for KA patients vs. 9.1 days (range, 0–89) for MA patients (P = 0.006). Reasons for missing included admission to the hospital (17/218 [8 %]), death (4/218 [2 %]), appointments with primary oncologists (37/218 [18 %]), other appointments (19/218 [9 %]), visits to the emergency room (ER) (9/218 [9 %]), and unknown (111/218 [54 %]). MA patients visited the ER more at 2 weeks (16/214 [7 %] vs. 5/217 [2 %], P = 0.010) and 4 weeks (17/205 [8 %] vs. 8/217 [4 %], P = 0.060). Median-survival duration for MA patients was 177 days (range, 127–215) vs. 253 days (range, 192–347) for KA patients (P = 0.013). Multivariate analysis showed that MAs were associated with longer time between referral and scheduled appointment (odds ratio [OR], 1.026/day, P = 0.030), referral from targeted therapy services (OR, 2.177, P = 0.004), living in Texas/Louisiana regions (OR, 2.345, P = 0.002), having an advanced directive (OR, 0.154, P < 0.0001), and being referred for symptom control (OR, 0.024, P = 0.0003). Conclusion: MA patients with advanced cancer have worse survival and increased ER utilization than KA patients. Patients at higher risk for MA should undergo more aggressive follow-up. More research is needed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84939894137&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2254-8; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24771301; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00520-014-2254-8; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2254-8; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00520-014-2254-8
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know