An integrated interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS methodology to determine the safest route for cash in transit operations: a real case in Istanbul
Neural Computing and Applications, ISSN: 1433-3058, Vol: 34, Issue: 18, Page: 15673-15688
2022
- 11Citations
- 36Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The Cash in Transit (CIT) deals with the money distribution and picking up between depot(s), central bank, bank branches, Automated Teller Machines (ATMs), jewelry stores, and exchange offices, safely and quickly. It is critical for companies carrying out CIT activities to identify risks and their priorities. It is one of the problems to be resolved for CIT companies to determine the risks that may occur on the route for each vehicle that will carry money from a certain center to the demand points. It is important for decision makers how critical these routes are concerning risks. Within the scope of the study, determining the risks, the weights of these risks, and high-risk routes accordingly are discussed. The literature review related to the problem is first consulted. After the literature review, interviews are made with experts on their subject. The main criteria and sub-criteria to define the risks are determined. Then, these criteria are weighted by the Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (IVIF-AHP), and risk assessment is made to alternative routes based on these weighted risks. The routes are evaluated by Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (IVIF-TOPSIS) methodology, and thus, it is determined which route has the highest risk and which route has the lowest risk. In this way, it is stated on which route should be used for the vehicles to distribute money and which routes should be improved.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know