Botulinum toxin in clinical practice: state of the art of administration provisions in Italy
Neurological Sciences, ISSN: 1590-3478, Vol: 44, Issue: 5, Page: 1777-1782
2023
- 1Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- Captures6
- Readers6
Article Description
Botulinum neurotoxin type A is a remarkable therapeutic approach for muscle hyperactivity syndromes, pain, and related disorders. Despite its wide application in neurology, there is a poor knowledge on delivery protocols and dispatch from the healthcare providers. In this study, we reported the result of a 2020 survey about the administration provisions of botulinum neurotoxin type A in Italy. Seven questions including information on characteristics of botulinum neurotoxin facilities, prescription, reimbursement, and execution modalities were adopted. Sixty participants answered the survey. Despite the wide availability of dedicated centers all over the national territory, there was a surprising lack of standardized and shared administration provisions. Most of the Italian medical structures delivered botulinum neurotoxin through outpatient clinics located in public hospital facilities, through the “F file” reimbursement modality. However, there was no agreement on the reimbursement request modality, creating differences in public costs relative to the botulinum toxin consumption across Italy.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85148653012&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-023-06693-0; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36820989; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10072-023-06693-0; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-023-06693-0; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10072-023-06693-0
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know