Colorectal surgeons and biomedical scientists improve lymph node harvest in colorectal cancer
Techniques in Coloproctology, ISSN: 1123-6337, Vol: 12, Issue: 4, Page: 295-298
2008
- 17Citations
- 19Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations17
- Citation Indexes17
- 17
- CrossRef14
- Captures19
- Readers19
- 19
Article Description
Background: The aim of this study was to review lymph node retrieval from colorectal cancer resections. Methods: We examined consecutive, single colorectal cancers excised between September 1999 and February 2007. Data gathered included patient age and gender, cancer location, total number of lymph nodes and involved lymph nodes identified. The speciality of the operating surgeon was recorded. Whether a pathologist or biomedical scientist was responsible for harvesting lymph nodes from the resected specimen was also noted. Results: A total of 1,194 patients were identified. Increased numbers of lymph nodes identified was associated with increased lymph node positivity (p<0.001, r=0.121). Biomedical scientists identified more lymph nodes (median 15, range 12-20) within specimens than consultant pathologists (median 10, range 7-13; p<0.001). Colorectal surgeons removed more lymph nodes (median 11, range 7-15) than non-colorectal surgeons (median 9, range 7-14; p=0.002). Conclusions: There was a significant increase in lymph node harvesting over time and this correlated with lymph node positivity. Lymph node harvest was significantly higher when the resection was performed by a colorectal surgeon and when the specimen was examined by a biomedical scientist. For accurate staging and consequent correct planning of adjuvant treatment and prognosis, resections should be performed by a colorectal surgeon and the lymph nodes harvested by a biomedical scientist. © 2008 Springer-Verlag.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=58549087349&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-008-0438-2; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19018472; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10151-008-0438-2; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-008-0438-2; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10151-008-0438-2; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s10151-008-0438-2; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s10151-008-0438-2
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know