Peritoneal dialysis as a treatment option in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease
International Urology and Nephrology, ISSN: 1573-2584, Vol: 47, Issue: 10, Page: 1739-1744
2015
- 14Citations
- 22Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations14
- Citation Indexes14
- 14
- CrossRef9
- Captures22
- Readers22
- 22
Article Description
Purpose: When choosing a dialysis option for ADPKD patients, peritoneal dialysis (PD) is often discouraged, due to its potential drawbacks: risk of abdominal hernias and dialysis fluid leaks, risk of peritonitis and insufficient dialysis adequacy. The present study was designed to compare the outcomes and dialysis efficacy in ADPKD patients treated with PD, in comparison with non-ADPKD subjects. Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of the data from the national PD registry in which 106 ADPKD and 1606 non-ADPKD incident PD patients were evaluated. Data on dialysis adequacy, risk of dialysis-associated complications, as well as patient and technique survival were compared between the groups. Results: The ADPKD patients did not differ from the non-ADPKD controls in terms of dialysis adequacy. After a median observation time of 32 months, there were no differences in patient or technique survival. The risk of abdominal hernias and dialysis fluid leaks was twice as high in ADPKD subjects, compared to the non-ADPKD group. However, these complications did not result in a need for a permanent transfer to hemodialysis. Conclusions: Dialysis adequacy, and patient and technique survival are similar in the ADPKD and non-ADPKD patients treated with PD. PD seems a feasible treatment option for end-stage renal failure in the course of ADPKD.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84944179378&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-015-1087-9; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26282281; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11255-015-1087-9; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-015-1087-9; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11255-015-1087-9
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know