The legal implications of error in radiology
Radiologia Medica, ISSN: 0033-8362, Vol: 113, Issue: 4, Page: 599-608
2008
- 15Citations
- 18Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations15
- Citation Indexes15
- 15
- CrossRef13
- Captures18
- Readers18
- 18
Article Description
Evaluation of the legal implications of error in radiology and therefore the assessment of criminal and civil liability in the practice of the profession requires an analysis of how the public perception of the right to health has radically changed. This change has initiated a defensive approach to medicine and radiology that tends to be oriented towards precautionary measures, with a proliferation of often unnecessary imaging studies. In radiology, errors of omission or commission are frequent. A critical appraisal of the different types of error in radiology will help practitioners undertake the essential corrective measures. Through analysis of several cases derived from legal or insurance proceedings brought against radiologists, the most common forms of error are described, and their implications for criminal and civil liability are illustrated, although it is emphasised that the existence of an error does not always translate into the presence of malpractice. © 2008 Springer-Verlag.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=48349118500&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-008-0279-0; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18536873; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11547-008-0279-0; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-008-0279-0; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11547-008-0279-0
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know