Slurry Erosion Behavior of Cast 25 Cr Austenitic-Ferritic Steel with Niobium Addition for Subsea Pipelines
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, ISSN: 1544-1024, Vol: 30, Issue: 8, Page: 6224-6234
2021
- 4Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Austenitic-ferritic steel, as suggested by its name, has an equal fraction of austenite and ferrite phases, also known as duplex stainless steels (DSS), are one of the highly used materials for subsea pipelines applications. The presence of slurries is inevitable in subsea pipelines. This technical work elucidates the slurry erosive wear behavior of duplex stainless steel and the impact of the addition of niobium (Nb) on the phenomena. Vacuum induction melting was used to produce duplex stainless steel, and its Nb added casts. The aim of the work is to compare both castings' for erosive wear behavior using a slurry jet erosion tester. Computational thermodynamic software Thermo-calc was used to investigate the presence of numerous phases in the system. X-ray diffraction (XRD) has confirmed the formation of niobium carbide in the steel, indicated by Thermo-calc. The effect of slurry velocity (30, 40, and 50 m/s) and impingement angle of slurry (30°, 45°, and 90°) on wear characteristics of these castings were analyzed using volume loss measurements, optical profilometry, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The erosion rate of both the materials increased with increasing velocity, whereas erosion was more at shallow angles of impact and increased significantly at the slurry jet's normal incidence. Refinement of austenitic grains in the ferritic pool hints at an increase in heterogeneous nucleation in Nb-doped samples; at the same time, the samples have shown increased hardness and superior erosion resistance against the slurry jet impact.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85105492443&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05845-7; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11665-021-05845-7; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11665-021-05845-7.pdf; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11665-021-05845-7/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05845-7; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11665-021-05845-7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know