PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

The bottleneck effect in lung cancer clinical trials

Journal of Cancer Education, ISSN: 0885-8195, Vol: 28, Issue: 3, Page: 488-493
2013
  • 5
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 37
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Article Description

Clinical trials provide the most promising way to improve treatment outcomes in cancer. This study examined the rate at which eligible patients with lung cancer, at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center in the South, were offered a clinical trial and explored for reasons for ineligibility. We retrospectively reviewed 300 randomly selected lung cancer patients' medical records seen in 2010, to assess clinical trial offers to eligible patients, reasons for not offering an eligible patient a trial, demographic factors associated with eligibility, and reasons for refusal among those offered a trial. Of the 300 patient charts, seven were excluded for lack of confirmed lung cancer diagnosis. Forty-six of the remaining 293 (15.7 %) patients were eligible for a clinical trial. Forty-five of the 46 (97.8 %) were considered for a trial by their oncologist. Thirty-five of the 45 (77.8 %) were offered a trial: 15 agreed (42.9 % of those offered, 5.1 % of patients reviewed), 11 declined, and 9 were undecided at the end of the review window. Patients with poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status levels and small cell (SC) diagnoses were significantly less likely to be eligible for a trial. Results suggest that oncologists at the cancer center are effectively presenting all eligible patients with the option of a clinical trial; however, there is a need to increase the number of approved clinical trials for patients with SC or ECOG score greater than 2. © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013.

Bibliographic Details

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know