Comparison of adaptive pacing therapy, cognitive behaviour therapy, graded exercise therapy, and specialist medical care for chronic fatigue syndrome (PACE): a randomised trial.

Citation data:

Lancet (London, England), ISSN: 1474-547X, Vol: 377, Issue: 9768, Page: 823-36

Publication Year:
2011
Captures 679
Readers 426
Exports-Saves 253
Mentions 73
Blog Mentions 52
News Mentions 18
References 3
Social Media 314
Tweets 185
Shares, Likes & Comments 129
Citations 423
Citation Indexes 423
PMID:
21334061
DOI:
10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60096-2; 10.1016/s0140-6736%2811%2960096-2
PMCID:
PMC3065633
Author(s):
White, P D; Goldsmith, K A; Johnson, A L; Potts, L; Walwyn, R; DeCesare, J C; Baber, H L; Burgess, M; Clark, L V; Cox, D L; Bavinton, J; Angus, B J; Murphy, G; Murphy, M; O'Dowd, H; Wilks, D; McCrone, P; Chalder, T; Sharpe, M; PACE trial management group Show More Hide
Publisher(s):
Elsevier BV
Tags:
Medicine
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
Most Recent Blog Mention
Most Recent News Mention
article description
Trial findings show cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) and graded exercise therapy (GET) can be effective treatments for chronic fatigue syndrome, but patients' organisations have reported that these treatments can be harmful and favour pacing and specialist health care. We aimed to assess effectiveness and safety of all four treatments.