Comparison of adaptive pacing therapy, cognitive behaviour therapy, graded exercise therapy, and specialist medical care for chronic fatigue syndrome (PACE): a randomised trial.

Citation data:

Lancet (London, England), ISSN: 1474-547X, Vol: 377, Issue: 9768, Page: 823-36

Publication Year:
2011
Captures 503
Exports-Saves 253
Readers 250
Mentions 67
Blog Mentions 49
News Mentions 15
References 3
Social Media 305
Shares, Likes & Comments 178
Tweets 127
Citations 403
Citation Indexes 402
Clinical Citations 1
PMID:
21334061
DOI:
10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60096-2; 10.1016/s0140-6736%2811%2960096-2
PMCID:
PMC3065633
Author(s):
White, P D; Goldsmith, K A; Johnson, A L; Potts, L; Walwyn, R; DeCesare, J C; Baber, H L; Burgess, M; Clark, L V; Cox, D L; Bavinton, J; Angus, B J; Murphy, G; Murphy, M; O'Dowd, H; Wilks, D; McCrone, P; Chalder, T; Sharpe, M; PACE trial management group Show More Hide
Publisher(s):
Elsevier BV
Tags:
Medicine
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
Most Recent Blog Mention
Most Recent News Mention
article description
Trial findings show cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) and graded exercise therapy (GET) can be effective treatments for chronic fatigue syndrome, but patients' organisations have reported that these treatments can be harmful and favour pacing and specialist health care. We aimed to assess effectiveness and safety of all four treatments.