BCR ® -701: A review of 10-years of sequential extraction analyses

A detailed quantitative analysis was performed on data presented in the literature that focused on the sequential extraction of cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb) and zinc (Zn) from the certified reference material BCR-701 (lake sediment) using the three-step harmonized BCR ® procedure. The accuracy of data reported in the literature, including precision and different measures of trueness, was assessed relative to the certified values for BCR-701. Forty data sets were accepted following extreme outlier removal, and statistically summarized with measures of central tendency, dispersion, and distribution form. In general, literature data were similar in their measurement precision to the expert laboratories used to certify the trace element contents in BCR-701. The overall median precision for literature reported data was 10% (range 6–19%), compared to certifying laboratories of 9% (range 4–33%). One measure of literature data trueness was assessed via a confirmatory approach using a robust bootstrap method. Only 22% of the comparisons indicated significantly different (all were lower) concentrations reported in the literature compared to certified values. The question of whether the differences are practically significant for environmental studies is raised. Bias was computed as a measure of trueness, and literature data were more frequently negatively biased, indicating lower concentrations reported in the literature for the six trace elements for the three-step sequential procedure compared to the certified values. However, 95% confidence intervals about the average bias for the 18 comparisons indicated only four instances when a mean bias of 0 (i.e., measured = certified) was not incorporated—suggesting statistical difference. Finally, Z -scores incorporating a Horwitz-type function were used to assess the general trueness of laboratory data. Of the 468 laboratory Z -score values computed, 92% were considered to be satisfactory, 5% were questionable, and 3% were unsatisfactory. A detailed examination of the methodology sections of the various studies showed that despite claiming adherence to the harmonized BCR sequential extraction protocol, significant deviations were commonly observed; particularly in moisture correction, sample mass, centrifugation specifics, shaking specifics, and incorporation of filtration. It is likely that failure to strictly adhere to the protocol adversely impacted accuracy, by increasing the degree of imprecision and resulting in more discrepant trueness values.