Environmental quality and population welfare in Markovian eco-evolutionary dynamics
Applied Mathematics and Computation, ISSN: 0096-3003, Vol: 431, Page: 127309
2022
- 16Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Environmental change and human behavior are co-depended. The quality of the environment affects human’s welfare, and the human’s behavior in turn changes the environment. Yet the co-dependent nature seems to give a single individual few capabilities to change the environment. Intuitively, it is the collective actions that matter. What is a single individual able to do with the population welfare and the environment? We set up a toy model to explicitly address this issue. We take into account the eco-evolutionary nature of the feedback between environment and human behavior. One strategy, termed as Welfare-Time strategy, is found, using which one individual suffices to set a linear relationship between collective welfare and environmental quality, no matter what the opponent does. This linear relationship can be either positively or negatively correlated, which is also unilaterally set by a single individual. It indicates that collective welfare can be higher even if it takes longer in a poor environment. Furthermore, we prove that the Welfare-Time strategy is able to dominate Win-Stay-Lose-Shift strategy, which is evolutionary stable against many strategies in repeated games. Our work reveals a hidden relationship between population welfare and the environment quality, which can be controlled unilaterally by a single individual. In addition, it implies that a single individual is able to control the environmental quality, provided that the rule of the environmental dynamics is known.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096300322003836; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2022.127309; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85134691049&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0096300322003836; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2022.127309
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know