Improving quasi-zero-stiffness isolator performance: two hybrid isolators employing inerter elements
Applied Mathematical Modelling, ISSN: 0307-904X, Vol: 135, Page: 212-242
2024
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Article Description
The pursuit of enhanced low-frequency vibration isolation motivates the development of quasi-zero-stiffness vibration isolators (QZS-VIs), yet with inherent limitations. The nonlinear hardening stiffness may distort the resonance peak rightward, narrowing the isolation bandwidth. Additionally, the high sensitivity to excitation variations can exacerbate the rightward distortion and jumping phenomenon. In this study, two types of hybrid isolators (QZS-IE isolators) are developed by integrating inerter elements (IEs) with traditional QZS-VI to enhance isolation performance. Their distinct mass block configurations yield varied enhancement behaviors. The unified dynamic equation for the two QZS-IE isolators is derived using harmonic balance and arc-length methods, validated by Runge-Kutta. The analyses of stability and periodicity clarify their response characteristics. Subsequently, the study investigates the effects of geometry and excitation parameters, comparing the enhancements of the two QZS-IE isolators. The results manifest that the introduction of inerter elements improves low-frequency vibration isolation, suppressing peak transmissibility and reducing isolation beginning frequency. The type I QZS-IE isolator outperforms the type II QZS-IE and traditional QZS isolators in low-frequency isolation performance and excitation sensitivity. However, the high-frequency isolation performance of the type I isolator is hindered by the ascending transmissibility curve post anti-resonant frequency. The type II QZS-IE isolator rectifies resonance peak distortion while avoiding adverse effects. The different configurations of the inerter elements and the related attenuating strategies offer a guideline for diversified vibration isolation objectives.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0307904X24003275; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2024.06.035; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85197678612&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0307904X24003275; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2024.06.035
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know