SARS-CoV-2 spike protein interactions with amyloidogenic proteins: Potential clues to neurodegeneration
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, ISSN: 0006-291X, Vol: 554, Page: 94-98
2021
- 102Citations
- 153Captures
- 11Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations102
- Citation Indexes97
- 97
- CrossRef82
- Policy Citations5
- Policy Citation5
- Captures153
- Readers153
- 153
- Mentions11
- News Mentions9
- News9
- Blog Mentions2
- Blog2
Most Recent Blog
The Spike A growing number of scientists are sounding the alarm about the risks of both COVID and its cures: Clayton Fox
The Spike A growing number of scientists are sounding the alarm about the risks of both COVID and its cures: Clayton Fox Posted By Ruth
Most Recent News
It’s Time to Retire ‘Misinformation’
- Todayville Connect with us Todayville It’s Time to Retire ‘Misinformation’ Brownstone Institute Published 27 seconds ago 6 minute read From the Brownstone Institute By Pierre
Article Description
The post-infection of COVID-19 includes a myriad of neurologic symptoms including neurodegeneration. Protein aggregation in brain can be considered as one of the important reasons behind the neurodegeneration. SARS-CoV-2 Spike S1 protein receptor binding domain (SARS-CoV-2 S1 RBD) binds to heparin and heparin binding proteins. Moreover, heparin binding accelerates the aggregation of the pathological amyloid proteins present in the brain. In this paper, we have shown that the SARS-CoV-2 S1 RBD binds to a number of aggregation-prone, heparin binding proteins including Aβ, α-synuclein, tau, prion, and TDP-43 RRM. These interactions suggests that the heparin-binding site on the S1 protein might assist the binding of amyloid proteins to the viral surface and thus could initiate aggregation of these proteins and finally leads to neurodegeneration in brain. The results will help us to prevent future outcomes of neurodegeneration by targeting this binding and aggregation process.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X2100499X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.03.100; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85103391322&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33789211; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0006291X2100499X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.03.100
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know