Evaluación del citómetro UF-1000i como método de cribado en el diagnóstico de infecciones del tracto urinario
Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica, ISSN: 0213-005X, Vol: 32, Issue: 3, Page: 147-151
2014
- 20Citations
- 20Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations20
- Citation Indexes20
- 20
- CrossRef6
- Captures20
- Readers20
- 13
Article Description
El cultivo de orina supone una enorme carga de trabajo en el Laboratorio de Microbiología y sigue siendo técnica de referencia para el diagnóstico de las infecciones urinarias. Considerando la elevada prevalencia de resultados negativos, la implementación de un método de cribado fiable y rápido podría suponer un ahorro en costes de carga de trabajo y adelantar los resultados negativos.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213005X13000864; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eimc.2013.02.015; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84896720609&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23642284; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0213005X13000864; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eimc.2013.02.015
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know