Mitochondrial DNA copy number as a predictor of embryo viability
Fertility and Sterility, ISSN: 0015-0282, Vol: 111, Issue: 2, Page: 205-211
2019
- 50Citations
- 93Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations50
- Citation Indexes50
- 50
- CrossRef28
- Captures93
- Readers93
- 93
Review Description
The evaluation of embryo viability is typically based on morphologic and morphometric grading systems, which are known to be heavily affected by differences in subjective judgement. A significant proportion of euploid embryos do not implant even when the endometrium is normal, despite the wide incorporation of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. The need to improve reproductive outcomes following assisted reproductive treatments is culminating in the emergence of new research and technology with the potential to enhance embryo selection. The assessment of mitochondrial DNA content as a predictor of embryo viability has gained increasing attention among numerous promising approaches. As is common with new tools, this attention has led to both inflated expectations and serious disillusionment. Here we gather evidence to establish the true clinical applicability of this method. Controversy continues to surround this topic, adding both interest and confusion.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028218322167; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.11.021; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85059299037&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30611549; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0015028218322167; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.11.021
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know