Analysis of factors affecting the internal seawater flow performance of pressure-retaining drilling tool for seafloor drill during drilling process
Geoenergy Science and Engineering, ISSN: 2949-8910, Vol: 224, Page: 211601
2023
- 3Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In order to solve the low core collection rate during the natural gas hydrate pressure-retaining exploration, a pressure coring technology for seafloor drill is introduced, and the reasons for the decline in the core collection rate are analyzed. The mathematical model for predicting the water pressure change in the core barrel is established, and the design criteria of drainage path parameters of the drilling tool is formed and verified by engineering application. The results show that: when the valve spool opening x reaches 3.0 mm, the half cone angle α reaches 30°, and the equivalent annular area A 1 reaches 30 mm 2, the water pressure Δ P in the core barrel tends to be stable. Under the condition that the drilling speed is 20mm/s-50 mm/s and the ratio of the effective flow area of the screen is 0.2–1, the change of water pressure Δ P is little. When the valve spool opening is 4.0 mm, the velocity and pressure change of the seawater at the cone of the valve spool are stable. The engineering application in sediment formation shows that when adopting pressure coring method, the core collection rate exceeds 70% within the drilling speed of 20–30 mm/s.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949891023001884; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2023.211601; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85159768049&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2949891023001884; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2023.211601
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know