Evaluation and comparison of critical plane criteria for multiaxial fatigue analysis of ductile and brittle materials
International Journal of Fatigue, ISSN: 0142-1123, Vol: 112, Page: 279-288
2018
- 158Citations
- 90Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This paper conducts a comparative evaluation on typical critical plane criteria, including Fatemi-Socie, Wang-Brown, modified Smith-Watson-Topper (MSWT) and proposed modified generalized strain energy (MGSE) criteria for multiaxial fatigue analysis of ductile/brittle materials. Experimental datasets of four materials under uniaxial tension, torsion and proportional/non-proportional multiaxial loadings are introduced for model comparison. This study results indicate that criteria with additional material constants yield robust life predictions for different materials. Moreover, the criteria with shear and uniaxial fatigue properties are respectively suitable for ductile and brittle materials, particularly the MGSE superior to others for ductile/brittle materials while MSWT only for brittle materials.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142112318301208; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.03.028; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85044603947&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0142112318301208; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0142112318301208?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0142112318301208?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.03.028
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know