Spontaneous regeneration of bone following mandibular ramus bone harvesting: a CBCT analysis
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, ISSN: 0901-5027, Vol: 53, Issue: 10, Page: 853-859
2024
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures4
- Readers4
Article Description
The aim of this study was to evaluate healing at the donor site following autogenous block graft harvesting from the mandibular ramus. In this retrospective study, cone beam computed tomography images taken at different time-points were examined, and the volumes of preoperative and postoperative regions of interest were calculated in the software. Images were classified into four groups: 0–3 months, 4–6 months, 7–12 months, and >12 months post-surgery. To characterize the healing process over time, statistical analyses were conducted for both the 70% and 80% healing thresholds. Nearly half ( n = 15, 47%) of the 32 patients included in this study achieved 70% bone healing within 4–12 months post-surgery. At the end of the 28-month period covered by this study, 21 patients (66%) had achieved 70% bone healing. The median time to achieve 70% healing was 9 months, while the median time to achieve 80% healing was 28 months. The findings of this study validate the feasibility of reutilizing the mandibular ramus area for additional bone augmentation when other intraoral sites are unavailable.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0901502724001516; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2024.05.006; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85195061983&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38834407; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0901502724001516
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know