Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Assessment in Older Adults
Journal of the American College of Cardiology, ISSN: 0735-1097, Vol: 58, Issue: 14, Page: 1497-1506
2011
- 22Citations
- 25Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations22
- Citation Indexes22
- 22
- CrossRef16
- Captures25
- Readers25
- 20
Article Description
The goal of this paper was to determine whether assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) enhances prediction of new-onset heart failure (HF) and cardiovascular mortality over and above N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level in older adults. Elevated NT-proBNP levels are common in older adults and are associated with increased risk of HF. NT-proBNP and LVEF were measured in 4,137 older adults free of HF. Repeat measures of NT-proBNP were performed 2 to 3 years later and echocardiography was repeated 5 years later (n = 2,375), with a median follow-up of 10.7 years. The addition of an abnormal (<55%) LVEF (n = 317 [7.7%]) to initially elevated or rising NT-proBNP levels was evaluated to determine risk of HF or cardiovascular mortality. Changes in NT-proBNP levels were also assessed for estimating the risk of conversion from a normal to abnormal LVEF. For participants with a low baseline NT-proBNP level (<190 pg/ml; n = 2,918), addition of an abnormal LVEF did not improve the estimation of risk of HF and identified a moderate increase in adjusted risk for cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio: 1.69 [95% confidence interval: 1.22 to 2.31]). Among those whose NT-proBNP subsequently increased ≥25% to ≥190 pg/ml, an abnormal LVEF was likewise associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality but not HF. Participants with an initially high NT-proBNP level (≥190 pg/ml) were at greater risk overall for both outcomes, and those with an abnormal LVEF were at the highest risk. However, an abnormal LVEF did not improve model classification or risk stratification for either endpoint when added to demographic factors and change in NT-proBNP. An initially elevated NT-proBNP or rising level was associated with an increased risk of developing an abnormal LVEF. Assessment of LVEF in HF-free older adults based on NT-proBNP levels should be considered on an individual basis, as such assessments do not routinely improve prognostication.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S073510971102523X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.042; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80053037043&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21939835; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S073510971102523X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.042
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know