Plasma filtering techniques for nuclear waste remediation
Journal of Hazardous Materials, ISSN: 0304-3894, Vol: 297, Page: 153-159
2015
- 39Citations
- 34Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Nuclear waste cleanup is challenged by the handling of feed stocks that are both unknown and complex. Plasma filtering, operating on dissociated elements, offers advantages over chemical methods in processing such wastes. The costs incurred by plasma mass filtering for nuclear waste pretreatment, before ultimate disposal, are similar to those for chemical pretreatment. However, significant savings might be achieved in minimizing the waste mass. This advantage may be realized over a large range of chemical waste compositions, thereby addressing the heterogeneity of legacy nuclear waste.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304389415003568; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.04.058; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84929453720&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25956646; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0304389415003568; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.04.058
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know