Performance assessment of time-domain damage indicators based on output-only measurement and Poincaré map: A comparative review on nonlinear structures
Measurement, ISSN: 0263-2241, Vol: 216, Page: 112847
2023
- 4Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
In view of the growing trends to explore the nonlinear dynamic behavior of a damaged structure, time-domain exhibits numerical superiority over frequency domain. Hence, a qualitative comparison on the performance of time-domain damage indicators is presented to explore their applicability in the identification of damage. The entire work is established in three steps. At first, structural members with different dynamic properties are numerically analyzed. An investigation on the benchmark structure and experimental set-up of a spring–mass system is then evaluated to summarize the performance. In addition, effect of environmental variation on the performance of evolving damage indicators is reviewed and investigated with real-time data of the Z24 bridge. In this way, the present study intends to facilitate researchers in uncovering the potential of time-domain. Some future scopes of improvement are also suggested based on the results obtained from the analysis.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263224123004116; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.112847; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85154055181&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0263224123004116; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.112847
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know