Regression by Re-Ranking
Pattern Recognition, ISSN: 0031-3203, Vol: 140, Page: 109577
2023
- 2Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Several approaches based on regression have been developed in the past few years with the goal of improving prediction results, including the use of ranking strategies. Re-ranking has been exploited and successfully employed in several applications, improving rankings by encoding the manifold structure and redefining distances among elements from a dataset. Despite the promising results observed, re-ranking has not been evaluated in regressions tasks. This paper proposes a novel, generic, and customizable framework entitled Regression by Re-ranking (RbR), which explores the ability of re-ranking algorithms in determining relevant rankings of objects in prediction tasks. The framework relies on the integration of a base regressor, unsupervised re-ranking learning techniques, and predictions associated with nearest neighbours weighted according to their ranking positions. The RbR framework was evaluated under a rigorous experimental protocol and presented significant results in improving the prediction when compared to state-of-the-art approaches.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031320323002777; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2023.109577; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85151620538&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0031320323002777; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2023.109577
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know