Hydrodynamic modeling of a circulating fluidized bed
Powder Technology, ISSN: 0032-5910, Vol: 172, Issue: 1, Page: 1-13
2007
- 47Citations
- 80Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Hydrodynamics plays a crucial role in defining the performance of circulating fluidized beds (CFB). The numerical simulation of CFBs is very important in the prediction of its flow behavior. From this point of view, in the present study a dynamic two dimensional model is developed considering the hydrodynamic behavior of CFB. In the modeling, the CFB riser is analyzed in two regions: The bottom zone in turbulent fluidization regime is modeled in detail as two-phase flow which is subdivided into a solid-free bubble phase and a solid-laden emulsion phase. In the upper zone core–annulus solids flow structure is established. Simulation model takes into account the axial and radial distribution of voidage, velocity and pressure drop for gas and solid phase, and solids volume fraction and particle size distribution for solid phase. The model results are compared with and validated against atmospheric cold bed CFB units' experimental data given in the literature for axial and radial distribution of void fraction, solids volume fraction and particle velocity, total pressure drop along the bed height and radial solids flux. Ranges of experimental data used in comparisons are as follows: bed diameter from 0.05–0.418 m, bed height from 5–18 m, mean particle diameter from 67–520 μm, particle density from 1398 to 2620 kg/m 3, mass fluxes from 21.3 to 300 kg/m 2 s and gas superficial velocities from 2.52–9.1 m/s.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032591006004736; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2006.10.035; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33846932598&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0032591006004736; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0032591006004736?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0032591006004736?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2006.10.035
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know