Resumen ejecutivo sobre el uso de la telemedicina en el ámbito hospitalario: recomendaciones del Foro Internacional de Medicina Interna
Revista Clínica Española, ISSN: 0014-2565, Vol: 223, Issue: 1, Page: 50-55
2023
- 1Citations
- 18Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Guideline Description
La implantación de la telemedicina como una herramienta más en la atención a pacientes en el ámbito hospitalario es un reto para cualquier sistema sanitario. Dadas las dificultades y limitaciones, el Foro Internacional de Medicina Interna (FIMI) ha promovido este Consenso que incluye a 20 sociedades científicas de 17 países de Europa y América. El objetivo fue realizar una propuesta, a modo de marco general, que permitiese el desarrollo e implantación de la telemedicina en la atención clínica hospitalaria y que fuese útil para los diferentes países integrantes del FIMI. El documento que presentamos recoge el resumen ejecutivo de las recomendaciones de la FIMI que pretenden garantizar intervenciones sanitarias efectivas, seguras, eficientes, sostenibles y proporcionadas y basadas en la mejor evidencia científica disponible. Los autores consideran que este documento debe actualizarse en el plazo máximo de dos años. The implementation of telemedicine as another tool for patient care in the hospital setting is a challenge for any healthcare system. Given the difficulties and limitations, the International Forum on Internal Medicine (FIMI, for its initials in Spanish) has sponsored this consensus document with 20 scientific societies from 17 countries in Europe and the Americas. The aim was to propose a general framework that allows for the development and implementation of telemedicine in hospital clinical care that would be useful to FIMI member countries. The document we present includes recommendations from the FIMI in its executive summary that intend to guarantee effective, safe, efficient, sustainable, and proportional healthcare interventions based on the best scientific evidence available. The authors believe that this document must be updated within a maximum period of two years.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014256522000145; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rce.2021.12.008; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85127336198&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0014256522000145; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rce.2021.12.008
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know