Open circuit mouthpiece ventilation: Concise clinical review
Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia, ISSN: 0873-2159, Vol: 20, Issue: 4, Page: 211-218
2014
- 49Citations
- 69Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations49
- Citation Indexes49
- 49
- CrossRef32
- Captures69
- Readers69
- 69
Article Description
In 2013 new “mouthpiece ventilation” modes are being introduced to commercially available portable ventilators. Despite this, there is little knowledge of how to use noninvasive intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIV) as opposed to bi-level positive airway pressure (PAP) and both have almost exclusively been reported to have been used via nasal or oro-nasal interfaces rather than via a simple mouthpiece.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S087321591400049X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rppneu.2014.03.004; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84904565231&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24841239; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S087321591400049X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rppneu.2014.03.004
Informa UK Limited
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know