Evaluation of oral and systemic manifestations in an amelogenesis imperfecta population
Journal of Dentistry, ISSN: 0300-5712, Vol: 31, Issue: 8, Page: 585-591
2003
- 34Citations
- 63Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations34
- Citation Indexes33
- 33
- CrossRef24
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures63
- Readers63
- 63
Article Description
Objectives : The aim of this investigation was to describe the dental and craniofacial characteristics of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta (AI). Methods : The study group included 43 patients(33 female and 10 male) with a mean age of 11.4±2.6 years. A panoramic and a cephalometric radiograph were obtained from each of these patients. Clinically AI cases were divided into four main groups according to Witkop. All patients were evaluated for chronological, bone and dental age. The patients who had severe retarded bone age were evaluated for plasma growth hormone(GH) concentrations. Results : Dental and bone ages were retarded with respect to chronological age in five patients. Dental maturity and tooth eruption were not age- appropriate in some of our patients. In type III AI patients a delay in skelatal age was observed. Severe late eruption was seen in 3 patients, severe delay in dental maturity was noted in patients with type IV AI. Dental age was clinically lower in GH-deficient subjects, and skeletal age was consistently more retarded than dental age when compared to chronological age. Anterior open bite was present in both primary and permanent dentitions of 50% of the patients with type I AI, 30.8% of the patients with type II AI, and 60% of type III AI. Conclusion : It is concluded that the primary structure for the classification of AI be based on the mode of inheritance, with the clinical and radiographic appearances (and any other features such as systemic findings) being the secondary discriminators.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571203001167; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(03)00116-7; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0141503882&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14554076; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0300571203001167; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0300571203001167?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0300571203001167?httpAccept=text/plain; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0300571203001167; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712%2803%2900116-7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712%2803%2900116-7
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know