Four types of visual mental imagery processing in upright and tilted observers
Cognitive Brain Research, ISSN: 0926-6410, Vol: 17, Issue: 2, Page: 238-247
2003
- 39Citations
- 112Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations39
- Citation Indexes39
- 39
- CrossRef31
- Captures112
- Readers112
- 112
Article Description
We investigated the role of body position on performance in four distinct types of mental imagery processing. Previous studies used the upright body position as standard procedure and therefore do not address the issue of whether mental imagery tasks are processed in accordance with ego-centered or gravitational coordinates. In the present study, the subjects were brought into one of three different body positions: upright, horizontal, or supine. In each of these body positions, we measured performance in four imagery tasks, which assessed (1) the ability to generate vivid, high-resolution mental images; (2) the ability to compose mental images from separate parts; (3) the ability to inspect patterns in mental images; and, (4) the ability to mentally rotate patterns in images. Not all processes were affected in the same way when subjects performed them in different body positions. Performance in the image composition and detection tasks depended on body position, whereas there was no such effect for the transformation and resolution tasks.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926641003001113; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0926-6410(03)00111-3; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0038105077&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12880895; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0926641003001113; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0926641003001113; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0926641003001113?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0926641003001113?httpAccept=text/plain; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0926-6410%2803%2900111-3; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0926-6410%2803%2900111-3
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know