Frameshift mutation, microsatellites and mismatch repair 1This article is part of the Reflections in Mutation Research series. To suggest topics and authors for Reflections, readers should contact the series editors, G.R. Hoffmann (ghoffmann@holycross.edu) or D.G. MacPhee (D.MacPhee@rerf.or.jp). 1
Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research, ISSN: 1383-5742, Vol: 437, Issue: 3, Page: 195-203
1999
- 53Citations
- 39Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations53
- Citation Indexes53
- 53
- CrossRef37
- Captures39
- Readers39
- 39
Review Description
The structure of eukaryotic DNA, with its repeated sequences, makes base addition and loss a major obstacle to the maintenance of genetic stability. As compared to the bacteria, much of the mismatch repair capacity of the eukaryotic cell must be devoted to the surveillance of frameshift changes. Any alteration in the activity of proteins which recognize frameshifts or which hold the DNA in place during replication is likely to result in genomic instability.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383574299000666; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1383-5742(99)00066-6; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0032736261&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10592327; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1383574299000666; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1383574299000666; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1383574299000666?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1383574299000666?httpAccept=text/plain; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1383-5742%2899%2900066-6; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1383-5742%2899%2900066-6
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know