Ecosystem services in the Great Lakes.

Citation data:

Journal of Great Lakes research, ISSN: 0380-1330, Vol: 43, Issue: 3, Page: 161-168

Publication Year:
2017
Usage 15
Abstract Views 14
Link-outs 1
Captures 58
Readers 58
Social Media 27
Tweets 27
Citations 8
Citation Indexes 8
PMID:
30034084
DOI:
10.1016/j.jglr.2017.02.004
Author(s):
Steinman, Alan D; Cardinale, Bradley J; Munns, Wayne R; Ogdahl, Mary E; Allan, J David; Angadi, Ted; Bartlett, Sarah; Brauman, Kate; Byappanahalli, Muruleedhara; Doss, Matt; Dupont, Diane; Johns, Annie; Kashian, Donna; Lupi, Frank; McIntyre, Peter; Miller, Todd; Moore, Michael; Muenich, Rebecca Logsdon; Poudel, Rajendra; Price, James; Provencher, Bill; Rea, Anne; Read, Jennifer; Renzetti, Steven; Sohngen, Brent; Washburn, Erika Show More Hide
Publisher(s):
Elsevier BV
Tags:
Agricultural and Biological Sciences; Environmental Science
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
A comprehensive inventory of ecosystem services across the entire Great Lakes basin is currently lacking and is needed to make informed management decisions. A greater appreciation and understanding of ecosystem services, including both use and non-use services, may have avoided misguided resource management decisions in the past that have resulted in legacies inherited by future generations. Given the interest in ecosystem services and lack of a coherent approach to addressing this topic in the Great Lakes, a summit was convened involving 28 experts working on various aspects of ecosystem services in the Great Lakes. The invited attendees spanned a variety of social and natural sciences. Given the unique status of the Great Lakes as the world's largest collective repository of surface freshwater, and the numerous stressors threatening this valuable resource, timing was propitious to examine ecosystem services. Several themes and recommendations emerged from the summit. There was general consensus that 1) a comprehensive inventory of ecosystem services throughout the Great Lakes is a desirable goal but would require considerable resources; 2) more spatially and temporally intensive data are needed to overcome our data gaps, but the arrangement of data networks and observatories must be well-coordinated; 3) trade-offs must be considered as part of ecosystem services analyses; and 4) formation of a Great Lakes Institute for Ecosystem Services, to provide a hub for research, meetings, and training is desirable. Several challenges also emerged during the summit, which are discussed in the paper.