Experimental Investigation of Asphaltene Deposition and Its Impact on Oil Recovery in Eagle Ford Shale during Miscible and Immiscible CO Huff-n-Puff Gas Injection
Energy and Fuels, ISSN: 1520-5029, Vol: 37, Issue: 4, Page: 2993-3010
2023
- 11Citations
- 273Usage
- 14Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations11
- Citation Indexes11
- 11
- Usage273
- Downloads269
- Abstract Views4
- Captures14
- Readers14
- 14
Article Description
One of the challenges in extracting oil from unconventional resources using hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling techniques is the low primary recovery rate, which is caused by the ultra-small permeability of these resources. Consequently, it is essential to investigate gas injection methods to produce the trapped oil in shale formations. However, the injection process can cause asphaltene depositions inside the reservoir, leading to plugging of pores and oil recovery (OR) reduction. There has been limited research on using gas injection techniques to improve oil production in tight/unconventional resources, although carbon dioxide (CO) and gas-enhanced oil recovery methods have been used in conventional resources. In order to determine whether or not the cyclic (huff-n-puff) CO process improves OR and aggravates asphaltene precipitation, a rigorous experimental investigation was undertaken utilizing filter membranes and Eagle Ford shale cores. After the minimum miscibility pressure was calculated for CO, various injection pressures were selected to perform CO huff-n-puff experiments. Investigations were carried out at 70 °C on injection pressure, cycle number, production time, and huff-and-puff mode injection. The results demonstrated that when the pore size structure of the membranes used was smaller and gas injection cycles increased, a higher asphaltene weight percent (wt %) was determined during the static experiments (i.e., employing filter paper membranes). Miscibility improved OR in dynamic testing (i.e., using shale cores), but a more oil-wet system was detected in wettability measurements taken following CO huff-and-puff tests. The plugging impact of asphaltene particles on the pore structure was studied using optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy imaging. Following the huff-and-puff tests, a mercury porosimeter revealed how severely the pores were plugged, and after the CO tests, the pore size distribution reduced as a consequence of asphaltene deposition. This study examines the significance of CO injection in OR under miscible/immiscible conditions to identify the critical parameters that could impact the effectiveness of CO huff-n-puff operation in unconventional formations.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85147174522&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c03359; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c03359; https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/geosci_geo_peteng_facwork/2080; https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3154&context=geosci_geo_peteng_facwork
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know