Gas exchange, water relations and osmotic adjustment in two scion/rootstock combinations of Prunus under various salinity concentrations
Plant and Soil, ISSN: 0032-079X, Vol: 259, Issue: 1-2, Page: 153-162
2004
- 73Citations
- 53Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Growth, gas exchange and water relations have been studied on hydroponically grown peach (cv. Armking) plants, grafted on GF (Arm/GF) and Mr.S. (Arm/MrS), exposed to 0, 40, 80 and 120 mM NaCl concentration, over a four-week period. Plant performance was also evaluated during a subsequent four-week period of relief from stress, by supplying the plants with a complete nutrient solution. Salinity stress reduced growth and net assimilation rate to a greater extent in Arm/GF than in Arm/MrS plants. Salt-induced water stress was more severe in Arm/GF than Arm/MrS leaves, and particularly during the first two weeks of treatment. On the other hand, leaf osmotic potential at full turgor (ψ) of salt-treated Arm/MrS received a markedly greater contribution from Na and Cl than salt-treated Arm/GF plants. By contrast, divalent cations and K made a substantially greater contribution to leaf ψ of salt-treated Arm/GF than to the corresponding ψ of Arm/MrS plants. Salinity stress markedly altered leaf carbohydrate composition and led to a preferential accumulation of sorbitol, independent on the scion/rootstock combination. Salt-treated Arm/GF but not Arm/MrS plants stored most of the Na and Cl loaded in the shoot, into basal (old) leaves. The rootstock ability to control the accumulation of salt in the scion leaves during the salinity stress, determined striking differences in the recovery of photosynthetic performances, during the relief period. A full recovery of A and g was detected in both 40 and 80 mM salt-treated Arm/GF leaves, but only in 40 mM salt-treated Arm/MrS, at the end of the relief treatment. These data indicate a greater efficiency of GF than Mr.S. in protecting peach plants from the deleterious effects of NaCl stress.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=1842809987&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/b:plso.0000020954.71828.13; http://link.springer.com/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000020954.71828.13; http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/b%3Aplso.0000020954.71828.13; https://dx.doi.org/10.1023/b%3Aplso.0000020954.71828.13; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000020954.71828.13
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know