A scalable, ecofriendly, and cost-effective lithium metal protection layer from a Post-it note
RSC Advances, ISSN: 2046-2069, Vol: 12, Issue: 1, Page: 346-354
2021
- 4Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations4
- Citation Indexes4
- CrossRef4
- Captures3
- Readers3
Article Description
Although there have been many studies addressing the dendrite growth issue of lithium (Li)-metal batteries (LMBs), the Li-metal anode has not yet been implemented in today's rechargeable batteries. There is a need to accelerate the practical use of LMBs by considering their cost-effectiveness, ecofriendliness, and scalability. Herein, a cost-effective and uniform protection layer was developed by simple heat treatment of a Post-it note. The carbonized Post-it protection layer, which consisted of electrochemically active carbon fibers and electrochemically inert CaCO3 particles, significantly contributed to stable plating and stripping behaviors. The resulting protected Li anode exhibited excellent electrochemical performance: extremely low polarization during cycling (<40 mV at a current density of 1 mA cm-2) and long lifespan (5000 cycles at 10 mA cm-2) of the symmetric cell, as well as excellent rate performance at 2C (125 mA h g-1) and long cyclability (cycling retention of 62.6% after 200 cycles) of the LiFePO4‖Li full cell. The paper-derived Li protection layer offer a facile and scalable approach to enhance LMB electrochemical performance.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85122695176&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1ra08310d; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35424511; https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=D1RA08310D; https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1ra08310d; https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2022/ra/d1ra08310d
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know