Local References for Ultrasound-Estimated Fetal Weight Based on 2,211 Singleton Pregnancies in the City of Curitiba, South of Brazil
Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, ISSN: 0100-7203, Vol: 42, Issue: 4, Page: 174-180
2020
- 1Citations
- 344Usage
- 9Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Objective To develop reference curves of estimated fetal weight for a local population in Curitiba, South of Brazil, and compare them with the curves established for other populations. Methods An observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study was conducted. A reference model for estimated fetal weight was developed using a local sample of 2,211 singleton pregnancies with low risk of growth disorders and well-defined gestational age. This model was compared graphically with the Hadlock and Intergrowth 21 curves. Results Reference curves for estimated fetal weight were developed for a local population. The coefficient of determination was R = 99.11%, indicating that 99.11% of the fetal weight variations were explained by the model. Compared with Hadlock curves, the 50 , 90 , and 97 percentiles in this model were lower, whereas the 10 percentile nearly overlapped, and the 3 percentile was slightly higher in the proposed model. The percentiles were higher in the proposed model compared with the Intergrowth 21 curves, particularly for the 3 , 10 , and 50 percentiles. Conclusion We provide a local reference curve for estimated fetal weight. The proposed model was different from other models, and these differences might be due to the use of different populations for model construction.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85084031353&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1709691; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32330958; https://journalrbgo.org/article/local-references-for-ultrasound-estimated-fetal-weight-based-on-2211-singleton-pregnancies-in-the-city-of-curitiba-south-of-brazil/; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032020000400174&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0100-72032020000400174&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032020000400174; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0100-72032020000400174; https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1709691
Federação das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know