Vertical Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review
Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, ISSN: 0100-7203, Vol: 43, Issue: 3, Page: 207-215
2021
- 13Citations
- 387Usage
- 88Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations13
- Citation Indexes13
- 13
- CrossRef12
- Usage387
- Full Text Views350
- 350
- Abstract Views37
- 37
- Captures88
- Readers88
- 88
Article Description
Objective The evaluation of the available evidence on vertical transmission by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV)-2. Data Sources An electronic search was performed on June 13, 2020 on the Embase, PubMed and Scopus databases using the following search terms: (Coronavirus OR COVID-19 OR COVID19 OR SARS-CoV-2 OR SARS-CoV2 OR SARSCoV2) AND (vertical OR pregnancy OR fetal). Selection of Studies The electronic search resulted in a total of 2,073 records. Titles and abstracts were reviewed by two authors (WPM, IDESB), who checked for duplicates using the pre-established criteria for screening (studies published in English without limitation regarding the date or the status of the publication). Data Collection Data extraction was performed in a standardized way, and the final eligibility was assessed by reading the full text of the articles. We retrieved data regarding the delivery of the potential cases of vertical transmission, as well as the main findings and conclusions of systematic reviews. Data Synthesis The 2,073 records were reviewed; 1,000 duplicates and 896 clearly not eligible records were excluded. We evaluated the full text of 177 records, and identified only 9 suspected cases of possible vertical transmission. The only case with sufficient evidence of vertical transmission was reported in France. Conclusion The risk of vertical transmission by SARS-CoV-2 is probably very low. Despite several thousands of affected pregnant women, we have identified only one case that has fulfilled sufficient criteria to be confirmed as a case of vertical transmission. Well-designed observational studies evaluating large samples are still necessary to determine the risk of vertical transmission depending on the gestational age at infection.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85104375720&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1722256; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33860504; https://journalrbgo.org/article/vertical-transmission-of-sars-cov-2-a-systematic-review/; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032021000300207&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0100-72032021000300207&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032021000300207; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0100-72032021000300207; https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1722256; https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-0040-1722256
Federação das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know