Same-day endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography after transduodenal endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle aspiration: Do we need to be cautious?
Endoscopy, ISSN: 0013-726X, Vol: 38, Issue: 11, Page: 1149-1151
2006
- 22Citations
- 20Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations22
- Citation Indexes22
- 22
- CrossRef14
- Captures20
- Readers20
- 20
Article Description
Patients who are undergoing endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for suspected pancreatic tumors frequently undergo endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for palliation of their symptoms. Performing EUS-FNA and ERCP in tandem may be cost-effective and may reduce procedure time, but the potential risks associated with this approach have not been clearly defined in the literature. We report two patients who underwent same-day therapeutic ERCP after transduodenal EUS-FNA for pancreatic tumors. Endoscopic biliary manipulation during ERCP aggravated an in-advertent and subclinical needle puncture injury to the bile duct sustained during the preceding EUS-FNA. This resulted in leakage of bile into the retroperitoneal space, and both patients required laparotomy and surgical drainage. Additional clinical evidence is needed to clarify these issues and to determine whether it would be prudent to perform therapeutic ERCP prior to diagnostic transduodenal EUS-FNA when these two procedures are planned as sequential or same-day procedures. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33751528245&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-944845; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17111340; http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-2006-944845; https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-944845; https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-2006-944845
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know