Artificially maintained scientific controversies, the construction of maternal choice and caesarean section rates
Social Theory and Health, ISSN: 1477-8211, Vol: 9, Issue: 2, Page: 166-182
2011
- 11Citations
- 28Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Caesarean section rates are continuing to rise in many countries. This is despite mounting evidence that unnecessarily high rates are associated with adverse health outcomes for mothers and their offspring and create a significant economic burden on health systems. This article draws on Bruno Latour's account of the artificially maintained scientific controversy to explore how professional bodies have managed to resist calls for reform by casting doubt on this evidence. Having undermined the evidence in question, these bodies insist that deference must be paid to maternal choice. However, choice is never problematised and the focus on maternal choice is used as a way of maintaining current practice. Science and technology studies has made us accustomed to being on our guard against unfounded claims to scientific certainty. This article demonstrates that we must also be wary of the opposite phenomenon, namely, of doubt being cast on a credible body of scientific evidence so as to justify inertia. When a narrative of scientific uncertainty is tied to fine sounding but ultimately spurious calls to respect patient autonomy, those with a vested interest in preserving the status quo are armed with a potent device with which to block demands for change. © 2010 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79955635271&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/sth.2010.12; http://link.springer.com/10.1057/sth.2010.12; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/sth.2010.12; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/sth.2010.12.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/sth.2010.12/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1057/sth.2010.12; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/sth.2010.12
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know