Design/build for water/wastewater facilities: State of the industry survey and three case studies
Journal of Management in Engineering, ISSN: 0742-597X, Vol: 20, Issue: 1, Page: 16-24
2004
- 35Citations
- 56Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
Documented successes of innovative delivery methods and recent changes in procurement laws are enabling water and wastewater utility owners to use alternative delivery methods for the construction of new facilities and the expansion of existing facilities. This shift toward alternative project delivery systems, such as design/build, has resulted in demand for additional guidance for owners and practitioners. This paper provides the results of an industrywide survey and three in-depth case studies. The survey results indicate large-scale growth in the use of design/build project delivery for water and wastewater facilities throughout the United States. The findings from the case studies indicate that common practices exist with regard to selecting a delivery system, contracting, allocating risk, evaluating proposals, determining the level of design in the request for proposals, using consultants, establishing trust, identifying key players, and permitting. These results serve as best practices for owners and practitioners using design/build delivery for the first time. © ASCE.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=14744287527&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0742-597x(2004)20:1(16); http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%290742-597X%282004%2920%3A1%2816%29; http://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/%28ASCE%290742-597X%282004%2920%3A1%2816%29; https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%290742-597X%282004%2920%3A1%2816%29; http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/%28asce%290742-597x%282004%2920%3A1%2816%29; https://dx.doi.org/10.1061/%28asce%290742-597x%282004%2920%3A1%2816%29
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know