Penalized MM regression estimation with L penalty: a robust version of bridge regression
Statistics, ISSN: 1029-4910, Vol: 50, Issue: 6, Page: 1236-1260
2016
- 4Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The bridge regression estimator generalizes both ridge regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) estimators. Since it minimizes the sum of squared residuals with a Lγ penalty, this estimator is typically not robust against outliers in the data. There have been attempts to define robust versions of the bridge regression method, but while these proposed methods produce bridge regression estimators robust to vertical outliers and heavy-tailed errors, they are not robust against leverage points. We propose a robust bridge regression estimation method combining MM and bridge regression estimation methods. The MM bridge regression estimator obtained from the proposed method is robust against vertical outliers and leverage points. Furthermore, for appropriate choices of the penalty function, the proposed method is able to perform variable selection and parameter estimation simultaneously. Consistency, asymptotic normality, and sparsity of the MM bridge regression estimator are achieved. We propose an algorithm to compute the MM bridge regression estimate. A simulation study and a real data example are provided to demonstrate the performance of the MM bridge regression estimator for finite sample cases.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know