Advocacy Coalitions and Punctuated Equilibrium in the Same-Sex Marriage Debate: Learning from Pro-LGBT Policy Changes in Minneapolis and Minnesota

Citation data:

Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, ISSN: 1053-8720, Vol: 22, Issue: 1-2, Page: 165-182

Publication Year:
2010
Usage 5637
Abstract Views 4862
Full Text Views 408
Link-outs 367
Captures 304
Exports-Saves 291
Readers 13
Citations 3
Citation Indexes 3
DOI:
10.1080/10538720903332578
Author(s):
Lake Dziengel
Publisher(s):
Informa UK Limited
Tags:
Social Sciences
article description
Policy change to actualize same-sex marriage requires planning and practices that can be most effective to advance marriage equality. This case study examines how building and maintaining strong coalitions aided in attainment and preservation of civil rights and protections for same-sex couples in Minnesota. As a historical policy analysis, it dissects collaborative strategies and events that led to a municipal domestic partner ordinance and state civil rights protections for sexual minorities in Minnesota during 1983-1995. Viewed through the lens of Advocacy Coalition Framework and Punctuated Equilibrium theory, findings support and highlight the importance of strategic planning of developing capable leaders, building strong coalitions, and capitalizing on events to garner public support and advance public policy toward civil rights protections and legal recognition for same-sex couples. © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.