Effects of correlations between particle longitudinal positions and transverse plane on bunch length measurement: A case study on GBS electron LINAC at ELI-NP
Measurement Science and Technology, ISSN: 1361-6501, Vol: 29, Issue: 2
2018
- 3Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In high-brightness LINear ACcelerators (LINACs), electron bunch length can be measured indirectly by a radio frequency deflector (RFD). In this paper, the accuracy loss arising from non-negligible correlations between particle longitudinal positions and the transverse plane (in particular the vertical one) at RFD entrance is analytically assessed. Theoretical predictions are compared with simulation results, obtained by means of ELEctron Generation ANd Tracking (ELEGANT) code, in the case study of the gamma beam system (GBS) at the extreme light infrastructure-nuclear physics (ELI-NP). In particular, the relative error affecting the bunch length measurement, for bunches characterized by both energy chirp and fixed correlation coefficients between longitudinal particle positions and the vertical plane, is reported. Moreover, the relative error versus the correlation coefficients is shown for fixed RFD phase 0 rad and π rad. The relationship between relative error and correlations factors can help the decision of using the bunch length measurement technique with one or two vertical spot size measurements in order to cancel the correlations contribution. In the case of the GBS electron LINAC, the misalignment of one of the quadrupoles before the RFD between -2 mm and 2 mm leads to a relative error less than 5%. The misalignment of the first C-band accelerating section between -2 mm and 2 mm could lead to a relative error up to 10%.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85041069662&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/aaa281; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6501/aaa281; http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6501/aaa281/pdf; http://stacks.iop.org/0957-0233/29/i=2/a=024005/pdf; http://stacks.iop.org/0957-0233/29/i=2/a=024005?key=crossref.8c41da5309ff9f8fba4f21d5b1d048ec; http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6501/aaa281; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/aaa281; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=57bd5cc5-da70-4755-93df-be9b6fec3133&ssb=59146237830&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1361-6501%2Faaa281&ssi=da7d3d4a-cnvj-4275-acc6-a0aba5265101&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=312878962662413167486093581273607653&ssn=848edc05152d26f8f9a7e5a29bd3b2b1f3cc0900c3c4-8990-4f21-ada2fe&sso=77b86f8c-bc564dd29deaa4c7a6e1c3cc96ecc2caa89113f87d0af055&ssp=93524175231726566267172703820301177&ssq=02678005235694116258129239272863687062469&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwMGMxZDc2YmItMzk2MS00N2VjLTlkZGItNjdmYTVhZTY2ODdlOC0xNzI2NTI5MjM5NDUzNTIzMTE3Mzc4LWRiZjVjYTYxZGU3MGI4YmI3NDgzNTciLCJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDBkNzYzNGE3Ni05ZTRkLTRjMmMtYjJhMC1mYzAzNGMyZjE1MjkxNzI2NTI5MjM5NDUzNTIzMTE3Mzc4LWFlNTE4YmYxNzFiOWQ0YjA3NDg0NDEifQ==
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know