Erratum: Lymph node with the highest FDG uptake predicts distant metastasis-free survival in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (Clinical Nuclear Medicine (2018) 43 (e220-e225) DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000002145)
Clinical Nuclear Medicine, ISSN: 1536-0229, Vol: 43, Issue: 9, Page: 704-null
2018
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Correction Description
In the article beginning on page e220 of the July 2018 issue, some relevant financial support was not included in the disclosures section. The sentence should have been written as follows: Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: Supported partially by the National Research Foundation ofKorea funded by theMinistry of Science and ICT (NRF-2016K1A3A1A48953207 and NRF-2016R1E1A1A01943303). None declared to all authors.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85051841790&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/rlu.0000000000002250; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85077316311&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30036244; https://journals.lww.com/00003072-201809000-00021; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/rlu.0000000000002250; https://journals.lww.com/nuclearmed/Fulltext/2018/09000/Lymph_Node_With_the_Highest_FDG_Uptake_Predicts.21.aspx
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know